ArticleScientific reports2025
Multivariate evaluation method for the detection of pest infestations on plants via VOC analysis using gas chromatography mass spectrometry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) play an important role in the defense against pest infestations on plants. The analysis of these VOCs using gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) enables the detection of pests by analyzing the VOC composition (VOC profiles) for specific patterns and markers. The analysis of such complex datasets with high biovariability poses a particular challenge. For this reason, a multivariate evaluation method based on a self-written Python script, using principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA), was developed and tested for functionality using a dataset, which has been evaluated manually and has identified five specific markers (2,4-dimethyl-1-heptene, 3-carene, α-longipinene, cyclosativene, and copaene) for Anoplophora glabripennis (ALB) infestation on Acer trees. The results obtained in the present study did not only match the manually evaluated results, but lead to further insight into the dataset. Another sesquiterpene which is assumed to be α-zingiberene was identified as an ALB specific marker in addition to 2,4-dimethyl-1-heptene and 3-carene. Furthermore, the European native beetle species goat moth Cossus cossus (CC) and poplar long-horned beetle Saperda carcharias (SC) were also analyzed for their VOCs to differentiate ALB specific VOC from other pest infestations. This comparison lead to the conclusion that the compounds α-longipinene, cyclosativene, and copaene are not specific for ALB but for pest infestation in general. It was possible to identify not only specifically produced VOCs, but also differences in concentrations that arise specifically during ALB infestation. Therefore, the evaluation method for the detection of plant pests presented in this study represents a time-saving alternative to conventional non computing methods, which in addition provides more detailed results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.