Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40670570›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Simulation and analysis of evapotranspiration from desert grasslands based on a random forest regression model.

Haitao Chen, Nishi Chu, Aiqing Kang, Wenchuan Wang, Ji He

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Haitao ChenCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Nishi ChuCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Aiqing KangChina Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower, Beijing, 100038, China. kaqing@iwhr.com.
Wenchuan WangCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.
Ji HeCollege of Water Resources, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China.

Funding

Seminar 3 of the National Key R&D Program "Prevention and Control of Major Natural Disasters and Public Safety" 2023YFC3006503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evapotranspiration (ET) is a critical component of the water and energy cycles in desert grassland ecosystems. However, modeling ET in arid grasslands faces significant challenges due to data scarcity, high spatiotemporal heterogeneity, and complex interactions among climatic drivers. To address these challenges, this study developed a Random Forest Regression (RF-R) model integrated with high-resolution PML-V2 ET data and CRU meteorological datasets (2001-2020) to simulate ET in China's desert grasslands. The RF-R model achieved superior performance, with R² values of 0.953 (training) and 0.931 (testing), RMSE of 3.421 and 4.182 mm/month, and an average prediction bias of 11.815%. The comparative analysis between BPNN and SVR models confirms the robustness of RF-R estimates. Key climate factors were identified through multi-scale importance assessments: precipitation and wet-day frequency were the primary drivers, followed by cloud cover and diurnal temperature range. This study provides a reliable framework for ET simulation in data-scarce arid regions and supports targeted water management strategies for desert grassland restoration.

Indexed as

Desert grasslandEvapotranspirationPML-V2Random forest

Identifiers

PMID40670570
PMCPMC12267491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.