Observational studyScientific reports2025
Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerance of pamidronate in complex regional pain syndrom type 1.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Intravenous Pamidronate in Persistent Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS): A Retrospective Observational Study on Effectiveness and Tolerability.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine whether the delay between symptom onset and treatment initiation, the dose of pamidronate, and bone mineral density (BMD) influence the response to pamidronate treatment in complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS 1). A retrospective observational study included patients treated with pamidronate between 2013 and 2023. Treatment response was assessed based on symptom regression according to the Budapest criteria at one (M1) and four months (M4) post-treatment. Multivariate logistic regression identified factors associated with response. Among the 255 patients included, 14.5% responded at M1 and 67% at M4. Multivariate analysis showed that post-traumatic (OR 2.75, 95% CI [1.36-5.7], P = 0.0053) or idiopathic etiology (OR 5.47, 95% CI [1.86-18.92], P = 0.0037) compared to post-surgical etiology, and the presence of initial edema (OR 2.39, 95% CI [1.26-4.62], P = 0.0082), were associated with a better response at M4. BMD, treatment delay, and pamidronate dosage were not significantly associated with treatment response. These findings suggest that initial edema is a predictive factor for response to pamidronate in CRPS 1, with syndrome etiology also influencing outcomes. Increasing pamidronate dosage or infusion frequency does not seem to improve therapeutic efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.