ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysis of the mechanism of physical activity enhancing well-being among college students using artificial neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modeled associations between university physical education mechanisms and students' mental health.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explores the impact mechanism of college students' sports behavior on their well-being by constructing an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model. The study employs an ANN architecture that combines a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). A prediction model is established based on the characteristics of sports behavior and psychological indices of well-being, such as psychological resilience, self-efficacy, and subjective well-being. The results show that the proposed LSTM + CNN model has achieved significant improvement on the test set. Its mean absolute error is only 0.072, the mean square error is 0.00596, and the root mean square error is 0.077, which is remarkably superior to traditional machine learning methods such as random forest and support vector regression. The innovative advantages of the proposed model in capturing the nonlinear relationships and deep characteristics of psychological and behavioral data is proved. The analysis of Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) values reveals three key factors significantly influencing well-being improvement. These impactful factors include the high-frequency exercise days per week (≥ 4), sustained morning exercise duration, and participation levels in group sports activities. The analysis of the dynamic threshold effect reveals that the critical points of distinct characteristic values exhibit substantial variations in their impact on well-being. Concurrently, the regulatory influence of sports behavior demonstrates differing intensities across diverse conditions. This study provides a new theoretical basis for designing personalized sports interventions and improves the accuracy of predicting psychological measurement data. Thus, it demonstrates the potential of sports behavior in promoting the mental health and well-being of college students.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.