ArticleScientific reports2025
FeNO as a biomarker of interstitial and fibrotic pulmonary sequelae in patients admitted for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The silent epidemic within the pandemic: pathophysiology and prediction of post-COVID-19 diabetes.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- The Role of Exhaled Breath Analyses in Interstitial Lung Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary fibrosis after severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia is a major sequela in surviving patients which requires evaluation. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a marker of airway inflammation, easy to obtain and available in most functional testing laboratories of pulmonology services. Our objective was to evaluate the capacity of FeNO as a biomarker of interstitial and fibrotic pulmonary sequelae in patients admitted for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. We recruited 335 patients admitted for severe pneumonia secondary to SARS-CoV-2 who were being followed up at the Diffuse Interstitial Lung Disease unit at Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla. FeNO levels were higher in patients with fibrotic interstitial sequelae: mean 24.3 vs. 19.8 ppbs, p = 0.002, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-0.69 and an optimal cut-off point of 11 ppb maximizing the weighted combination of Sensitivity and specificity. FeNO ranked 6th among the 18 variables studied using various methods (forward selection, backward elimination, and stepwise regression) in evaluating the predictive ability for fibrotic interstitial sequelae, and it was the 5 th most predictive variable after using the cut-off point of 11 ppb. The joint predictive ability of the overall model with the 6 more predictive variables was higher than 0.8: AUC (Use of systemic corticosteroids + peak C-reactive Protein at admission + Age + Endotracheal intubation + Diffusing Capacity for CO (DLCO) + FeNO as quantitative continuous) = 0.81; 95%CI (0.77-0.86). AUC of the same model with FeNO as dichotomous (11 ppb cut-off point) = 0.82; 95%CI (0.78-0.87). Our study shows an increase in FeNO in patients who, after admission for severe SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia, present fibrotic interstitial sequelae at the three-month follow-up, as one of the different predictive variables related to the presence of these sequelae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.