Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40670502›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Developing a cost-effective tool for choke flow rate prediction in sub-critical oil wells using wellhead data.

Zhiwei Xun, Farag M A Altalbawy, Prakash Kanjariya, R Manjunatha, Debasish Shit, M Nirmala, Ajay Sharma, Sarbeswara Hota, Shirin Shomurotova, Fadhil Faez Sead and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhiwei XunChina University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing, 100083, China. Zhiwei0914@outlook.com.
Farag M A AltalbawyDepartment of Chemistry, University College of Duba, University of Tabuk, Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.
Prakash KanjariyaDepartment of Physics, Marwadi University Research Center, Faculty of Science, Marwadi University, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
R ManjunathaDepartment of Data Analytics and Mathematical Sciences, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Debasish ShitCentre for Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, 140401, India.
M NirmalaDepartment of Mathematics, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ajay SharmaDepartment of Applied Sciences-Mathematics, NIMS Institute of Engineering and Technology, NIMS University Rajasthan, Jaipur, India.
Sarbeswara HotaDepartment of Computer Application, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, 751030, India.
Shirin ShomurotovaDepartment of Chemistry Teaching Methods, Tashkent State Pedagogical University Named After Nizami, Bunyodkor Street 27, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Fadhil Faez SeadDepartment of Dentistry, College of Dentistry, The Islamic University, Najaf, Iraq.
Hojjat AbbasiChemistry Department, Herat University, Herat, Afghanistan. hojjatabbasimeybodi@gmail.com.
Mohammad Mahtab AlamCentral Labs, King Khalid University, AlQura'a, P.O. Box 960, Abha, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate prediction of oil production rates through wellhead chokes is critical for optimizing crude oil production and operational efficiency in the petroleum industry. The central thrust of this investigation involves the systematic creation of machine learning (ML) paradigms for the robust prediction of choke flow performance. This endeavor is rigorously informed by comprehensive data acquired from an operational petroleum production facility in the Middle East. Within the dataset, produced gas-oil ratio (GOR), choke size, basic sediment and water (BS&W), wellhead pressure (THP), and crude oil API stand out as key parameters. Each plays a vital role in forecasting the oil production rate. To ensure reliability, robust data preprocessing was conducted using the Monte Carlo outlier detection (MCOD) method to recognize and manage data outliers. The models were trained using 198 data points, employing K-fold cross-validation (five folds) to ensure generalization. Gradient boosting machine (GBM) models were optimized using advanced algorithms like self-adaptive differential evolution (SADE), evolution strategy (ES), Bayesian probability improvement (BPI), and Batch Bayesian optimization (BBO). Among these, SADE demonstrated superior performance based on metrics such as average absolute relative error (AARE%), R

Indexed as

Choke flow modelingCrude oil productionMachine learningOptimizationSHAP analysis

Identifiers

PMID40670502
PMCPMC12267588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.