ArticleScientific reports2025
Developing a cost-effective tool for choke flow rate prediction in sub-critical oil wells using wellhead data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of oil production rates through wellhead chokes is critical for optimizing crude oil production and operational efficiency in the petroleum industry. The central thrust of this investigation involves the systematic creation of machine learning (ML) paradigms for the robust prediction of choke flow performance. This endeavor is rigorously informed by comprehensive data acquired from an operational petroleum production facility in the Middle East. Within the dataset, produced gas-oil ratio (GOR), choke size, basic sediment and water (BS&W), wellhead pressure (THP), and crude oil API stand out as key parameters. Each plays a vital role in forecasting the oil production rate. To ensure reliability, robust data preprocessing was conducted using the Monte Carlo outlier detection (MCOD) method to recognize and manage data outliers. The models were trained using 198 data points, employing K-fold cross-validation (five folds) to ensure generalization. Gradient boosting machine (GBM) models were optimized using advanced algorithms like self-adaptive differential evolution (SADE), evolution strategy (ES), Bayesian probability improvement (BPI), and Batch Bayesian optimization (BBO). Among these, SADE demonstrated superior performance based on metrics such as average absolute relative error (AARE%), R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.