ArticleScientific reports2025
Fusion of microscopic and diffraction images with VGG net for budding yeast recognition in imaging flow cytometry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microscopic-Diffraction Imaging Flow Cytometry (MDIFC) is a high-throughput, stain-free technology that captures paired microscopic and diffraction images of cellular events, utilizing machine learning for the classification of cell subpopulations. However, MDIFC is still hindered by challenges related to limited accuracy, processing speed, and a lack of automation. To address this, we propose a novel approach that integrates image fusion techniques with a deep learning-based classification algorithm. Using budding yeast recognition as a model system, we categorized events into three groups: single cells, budding cells, and aggregated cells. Paired images were fused with varying weight factors to generate a comprehensive training dataset for a VGG-net-based Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). For comparison, Support Vector Machines (SVM) and Random Forests (RF) based on Grey-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) features were employed. The results demonstrate that the VGG-net classifier achieved an impressive classification accuracy of 0.98 when trained on a dataset with a fusion weight of 0.2 for microscopic images and 0.8 for diffraction images. Furthermore, it demonstrated a high throughput of 260.42 cells per second, surpassing the performance of GLCM-based methods. These findings suggest that the combination of image fusion and deep learning algorithms significantly improves both the speed and accuracy of cell classification in MDIFC, offering substantial benefits for high-throughput cell analysis in biological and medical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.