Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40670489›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Framework for processing operando neutron radiography of energy devices.

Jongmin Lee, Eric Ricardo Carreon Ruiz, Anders Kaestner, Pavel Trtik, Markus Strobl, Pierre Boillat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. One-pot neutron imaging of liquid-gas system: a parametric method study.Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jongmin LeePSI Center for Neutron and Muon Sciences, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, 5232, Switzerland. jongmin.lee@psi.ch.
Eric Ricardo Carreon RuizPSI Center for Neutron and Muon Sciences, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, 5232, Switzerland.
Anders KaestnerPSI Center for Neutron and Muon Sciences, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, 5232, Switzerland.
Pavel TrtikPSI Center for Neutron and Muon Sciences, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, 5232, Switzerland.
Markus StroblPSI Center for Neutron and Muon Sciences, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, 5232, Switzerland.
Pierre BoillatPSI Center for Neutron and Muon Sciences, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen PSI, 5232, Switzerland. pierre.boillat@psi.ch.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 23 04741K
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutron radiography is a powerful diagnostic technique for operando studies of electrochemical devices, such as fuel cells, batteries, and electrolyzers. However, processing time-series neutron images is challenging due to high spatial/temporal resolution requirements, limited neutron flux, complex sample geometry, and low signal-to-noise ratios. Existing image processing platforms are not adequate to mitigate these issues, causing bottlenecks in data analysis and interpretation. In this work, we present our Python-based framework: neutron radiography of electrochemical devices (NeuRED). This framework integrates a robust set of image processing functions within a transparent, reproducible, and user-friendly workflow. The advantages and unique features of the framework are outlined, and demonstrations are provided for proton exchange membrane fuel cells, Li-ion batteries, and gas-liquid systems. NeuRED is a unique open-access software tool for the electrochemistry community that will contribute to the advancements of operando imaging applications in energy research.

Identifiers

PMID40670489
PMCPMC12267630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.