Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40670481›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

New hybrid features extracted from US images for breast cancer classification.

Gigi Tăbăcaru, Simona Moldovanu, Dan Munteanu, Marian Barbu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gigi TăbăcaruDepartment of Automatic Control, Faculty of Automation, Computers, Electrical, Engineering and Electronics, "Dunărea de Jos" University of Galati, Galaţi, Romania.
Simona MoldovanuComputer Science and Information Technology, Faculty of Automation, Computers, Electrical Engineering and Electronics, "Dunărea de Jos" University of Galati, Galaţi, Romania. simona.moldovanu@ugal.ro.
Dan MunteanuComputer Science and Information Technology, Faculty of Automation, Computers, Electrical Engineering and Electronics, "Dunărea de Jos" University of Galati, Galaţi, Romania.
Marian BarbuDepartment of Automatic Control, Faculty of Automation, Computers, Electrical, Engineering and Electronics, "Dunărea de Jos" University of Galati, Galaţi, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), and image processing fields play a vital role in classifying benign and malignant breast cancer (BC). The novelty of this paper lies in computing original hybrid features (HF) from textural and shape features of BC integrated into a polynomial regression, and their classification with two different Automated Machine Learning (AutoML). The obtained data are original; therefore, a previous analysis of them with violin graphs was needed. For computing of the hybrid features, the Haralick textural features and Hu moments were integrated in a polynomial regression way. In this context, two different AutoML, PyCaret and TPOT (Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool) were proposed, and the optimal model for hybrid features included in the classification process was identified during the tuning process. The experimental results indicated that the HF, composed of entropy and Hu moments, was selected by PyCaret using the AdaBoost Classifier (ADB) as the optimal classifier, achieving an accuracy of 91.4%. Additionally, TPOT employed a Multilayer Perceptron Classifier, which provided an accuracy of 90.6%. These findings identified the most effective features for classifying benign and malignant breast cancer (BC). Enhancing computational efficiency reduces the risk of overfitting; hence, the bagging, boosting, and stacking Ensemble Machine Learning (EML) techniques were proposed to validate the obtained results. The study's originality lies in the HF's capacity to accurately represent and capture the lesion's texture and shape, just like a physician makes a BC diagnosis.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedUltrasonography, MammaryAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningAutoMLEnsemble machine learningHaralick featuresHu momentHybrid features

Identifiers

PMID40670481
PMCPMC12267442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.