ArticleScientific reports2025
New hybrid features extracted from US images for breast cancer classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid metaheuristic feature selection for breast cancer detection in digital mammography: a radiomics and deep learning pilot feasibility study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification and establishment of diagnostic model in breast cancer diagnosis with automated breast ultrasound.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- AutoCumulus: an automated mammographic density measure created using artificial intelligence.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Clinical evaluation of a nomogram model incorporating multimodal ultrasound features for breast cancer diagnosis.Gland surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI), and image processing fields play a vital role in classifying benign and malignant breast cancer (BC). The novelty of this paper lies in computing original hybrid features (HF) from textural and shape features of BC integrated into a polynomial regression, and their classification with two different Automated Machine Learning (AutoML). The obtained data are original; therefore, a previous analysis of them with violin graphs was needed. For computing of the hybrid features, the Haralick textural features and Hu moments were integrated in a polynomial regression way. In this context, two different AutoML, PyCaret and TPOT (Tree-based Pipeline Optimization Tool) were proposed, and the optimal model for hybrid features included in the classification process was identified during the tuning process. The experimental results indicated that the HF, composed of entropy and Hu moments, was selected by PyCaret using the AdaBoost Classifier (ADB) as the optimal classifier, achieving an accuracy of 91.4%. Additionally, TPOT employed a Multilayer Perceptron Classifier, which provided an accuracy of 90.6%. These findings identified the most effective features for classifying benign and malignant breast cancer (BC). Enhancing computational efficiency reduces the risk of overfitting; hence, the bagging, boosting, and stacking Ensemble Machine Learning (EML) techniques were proposed to validate the obtained results. The study's originality lies in the HF's capacity to accurately represent and capture the lesion's texture and shape, just like a physician makes a BC diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.