ArticleScientific reports2025
In vitro shear bond strength evaluation of resin cements between zirconia and titanium.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does simplification signify compromise? Evaluation of different universal adhesives on shear bond strength:Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the Shear Bond Strength (SBS) and durability of different resin cements used for cement-retained restorations between zirconia crowns and titanium abutments. A total of 36 zirconia cubes and 324 titanium cylinders were employed in this study. Accordingly, 6 groups were assigned according to the used resin cement: three self-etching types (RU, AI, GMP), two self-adhesive types (IS, GM) and one unfilled type (SB). Each group was further divided into 3 sub-group based on storage condition (n = 10): 24-hour water storage at 37 °C, 5,000 thermocycles, and 10,000 thermocycles respectively. SBS testing employed a universal testing machine to quantify the force required for material fracture at the interface, followed by failure mode analysis. Two-way ANOVA showed significant influences of storage conditions and bonding agents on SBS values (p < 0.05), except for IS and GMP (p > 0.05). The SBS values of AI and RU showed a downward trend, while SB and GM showed an upward trend after 10,000 thermocycles. The SBS values of GM and GMP were significantly different in the 24-hour water storage but not after thermocycles. Within the limitations of the current study and based on the findings, the following can be concluded: (1) SBS was significantly influenced by both bonding agent type and storage condition; (2) Bonding systems containing HEMA and 10-MDP exhibited high initial strength but declined significantly after thermocycling; (3) IS, GM, and GMP demonstrated stable bond durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.