ArticleScientific reports2025
Managing the fuzzy boundaries and partitions of marine ecological systems using network theory.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management and monitoring of populations in complex habitat mosaics is challenging, requiring effective zonation and bio regionalization strategies. In recent years, marine systems have been partitioned in multiple ways, such as marine protected zones and fishery stocks to enhance conservation and resource management. Viewing these systems as complex ecological networks of connected areas, habitat patches, or sub-populations (nodes) connected by the movement of organisms (edges) helps improve management. Network theory identifies communities or clusters of tightly connected sub-populations, revealing ecologically meaningful structures. Applying network-based community detection algorithms can uncover these ecological units, enhancing marine seascape management. However, there is no consensus on the best methods for identifying ecologically meaningful communities. This study evaluates several community detection algorithms in ecology and demonstrates their effectiveness using two marine case studies: a larval dispersal network and a ship traffic network. We show where algorithms agree in detecting communities and highlight the importance of aligning the nature of the algorithm, connectivity data, and management goals. We also suggest that disagreements between algorithms may indicate areas where management boundaries should be flexible or fluid to better reflect the system's true nature. This study proposes an improved approach to partitioning for optimal conservation and management outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.