ArticleScientific reports2025
Directed attention influences optimality of top-down and bottom-up multi-modal perceptual integration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03058133 (Neural Correlates of Multimodal Face/Voice Processing in a Gender Task.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neural Correlates of Multimodal Face/Voice Processing in a Gender Task.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multimodal sensory integration is a ubiquitous neural process that can be modeled as optimal cue combination, incorporating both top-down, attention-like signals and bottom-up evidence that impact the precision of response variables. Accordingly, reducing attention or adding noise to one modality is expected to decrease proportionally its contribution while increasing that of the other modality. We tested this prediction using a gender-comparison task employing stimuli for which the face and voice were independently morphed between average male and female exemplars. Top-down influences were manipulated by having observers judge the stimuli with respect to either one or both modalities. Bottom-up influences were manipulated by introducing independent and varying amounts of visual and auditory noise. The contributions of each modality were estimated by maximum likelihood within a signal detection model of the decision process. As expected, if the attended modality was degraded by noise, the contribution of the unattended modality increased in compensation. Contrary to prediction, however, noise in the unattended modality had no impact on the attended modality. The results signal a departure from an optimal cue combination rule and are relevant to theories of predictive processes and observations in bimodal learning in modality-specific agnosia (prosopagnosia, phonagnosia).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.