ArticleScientific reports2025
Multilocus phylogeny and phylogeographical patterns suggest the need for a comprehensive revision of the systematics of Stelliferinae Sasaki, 1989 (Sciaenidae, Acanthuriformes).
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluate the phylogenetic and phylogeographic patterns within Stelliferinae, the third most diversified subfamily in Sciaenidae, using a multilocus approach based on mitochondrial and nuclear markers, comprising 13 loci. Our results support the monophyly of Stelliferinae and the non-monophyly of Stellifer, whose species were grouped into three distinct clades, two of which were closely related to a clade encompassing Bairdiella, Elattarchus, Odontoscion, and Corvula. The monophyly of Odontoscion was rejected, since Odontoscion xanthops was found to be closer to Corvula macrops than to Odontoscion dentex, suggesting that both genera should be synonymized. In addition, our genetic inferences indicate that Stellifer menezesi and Stellifer gomezi represent a single species. Furthermore, O. dentex was grouped into two clades, one occurring in the Caribbean and another one on the Brazilian coast, which diverged ~ 3.3 million years ago (Ma), evidencing cryptic speciation likely driven by the Amazon River plume outflow. Our results suggest that Stelliferinae originated in the eastern Pacific around 16.7 Ma (13.2–20.3 Ma; Early Miocene) and subsequently colonized the western Atlantic during the Miocene and Pliocene, via the Central American Seaway, through multiple independent dispersal events. We also propose that the gradual rise of the Isthmus of Panama, which promoted changes in the oceanographic conditions in both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans, played a key role in the diversification of these taxa. In conclusion, we suggest that a thorough taxonomic review of Stelliferinae is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.