Trial reportScientific reports2025
Digital subtraction analysis after application of silver diamine fluoride on early proximal caries lesions: a 12-month randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of the study was to examine the mean mineral density (MD) change in early proximal enamel caries lesions after applying silver diamine fluoride (SDF) using digital subtraction radiographic analysis at 6 and 12 months. A split-mouth, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted with thirty healthy participants aged 13-30 years old. Two active non-cavitated proximal caries lesions in different quadrants of each participant were randomly sampled and allocated to a test (38% SDF) and a control group (deionized water). Digital radiographs at baseline, 6 and 12 months were taken, and digital subtraction radiographic analysis was performed. The SDF group demonstrated a significantly higher mean MD on subtraction radiographs compared with the control group, after adjusting for baseline lesion depth and time, and for clustering within participants over time. The adjusted mean difference was 1.0 [95% CI 0.2, 1.9]. Therefore, applying SDF at baseline and 6 months resulted in significant remineralization compared with the control group over the 12-month period. These findings suggested that applying SDF can serve as an effective alternative treatment option for remineralizing early caries lesions on proximal surfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.