Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40670434›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

In Silico tool for predicting, designing and scanning IL-2 inducing peptides.

Naman Kumar Mehta, Anjali Lathwal, Rajesh Kumar, Dilraj Kaur, Gajendra P S Raghava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Naman Kumar Mehta *Department of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, A-302 (R&D Block), Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase III, (Near Govind Puri Metro Station), New Delhi, 110020, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-0244-2826
Anjali Lathwal *Department of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, A-302 (R&D Block), Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase III, (Near Govind Puri Metro Station), New Delhi, 110020, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9810-8893
Rajesh Kumar *National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9835-3650
Dilraj KaurDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, A-302 (R&D Block), Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase III, (Near Govind Puri Metro Station), New Delhi, 110020, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2589-3613
Gajendra P S RaghavaDepartment of Computational Biology, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology, A-302 (R&D Block), Okhla Industrial Estate, Phase III, (Near Govind Puri Metro Station), New Delhi, 110020, India. raghava@iiitd.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8902-2876

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India BT/PR40158/BTIS/137/24/2021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) based immunotherapy has been approved for treating certain types of cancer, as IL-2 plays a crucial role in regulating the immune system. In this study, we developed a method for predicting IL-2-inducing peptides. Our method was trained, tested, and validated on a main dataset containing 6,574 experimentally validated Major histocompatibility complex (MHC) binders, including 3,429 IL-2-inducing and 3,145 non-inducing peptides. A primary analysis of IL-2 inducing and non-inducing peptides revealed that certain residues, such as alanine and leucine, are more abundant in IL-2-inducing peptides. Initially, we developed alignment-based methods, which demonstrated high precision but limited coverage. Subsequently, we developed artificial intelligence-based models, including machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and large language models (LLM), to predict IL-2-inducing peptides. Our Extra Tree-based model, developed using dipeptide composition and peptide length, achieved a maximum AUC of 0.82. Finally, we constructed ensemble models that combined artificial intelligence and alignment-based methods. Our best ensemble model, which integrates the Extra Tree-based model with MERCI, achieved the highest AUC of 0.84 and an MCC of 0.51 on the main dataset. One limitation of the main dataset is that both IL-2-inducing and non-inducing peptides are MHC binders. To address this limitation, we created two additional datasets: Alternate Dataset 1, consisting of 3,429 IL-2-inducing peptides and 3,429 non-inducing peptides (MHC non-binders), and Alternate Dataset 2, consisting of 3,429 IL-2-inducing peptides and 3,439 non-inducing peptides (MHC binders + MHC non-binders). Our best ensemble model achieved AUCs of 0.9 and 0.8 with MCCs of 0.61 and 0.44 on Alternate Datasets 1 and 2, respectively. To assist the scientific community, we have integrated the best models from this study into a standalone software and web server, IL2pred, which enables users to predict, scan, and design IL-2-inducing peptides ( https://webs.iiitd.edu.in/raghava/il2pred/ ).

Indexed as

Computational BiologyInterleukin-2PeptidesComputer SimulationDeep LearningHumansMachine LearningInterleukin-2PeptidesCancer immunotherapyIL-2 epitopesLarge Language modelsMERCI, machine learning techniques

Identifiers

PMID40670434
PMCPMC12267595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.