ArticleScientific reports2025
Global burden of alopecia areata from 1990 to 2019 and emerging treatment trends analyzed through GBD 2019 and bibliometric data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The Evolving Global Burden of Alopecia Areata in Young Adults: High-Income Nations Bear the Greatest Impact.Annals of dermatology · 2026Article
- Platelet-rich therapies in cutaneous and mucocutaneous disorders characterized by inflammatory tissue responses: mechanistic insights and clinical evidence.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Global, regional, and national burden of alopecia areata in adolescents and young adults aged 10-24 years from 1990 to 2021: a trend analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Global Psoriasis Burden 1990-2021: Evolving Patterns and Socio-Demographic Correlates in the Global Burden of Disease 2021 Update.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Longitudinal clinical course, treatment outcomes, and relapse patterns in alopecia areata: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global prevalence of alopecia areata (AA) is estimated to be around 2%. However, the global disease burden of AA and current research hotspots in this field have received limited attention. The disability adjusted life years (DALYs), incidence rates, and prevalence rates of AA from 1990 to 2019 were collected from the Global burden of disease (GBD) 2019 database and analyzed using R software to elucidate the temporal trend in disease burden associated with AA. VOSviewer software was employed to cluster keywords within the field of AA for identification of research hotspots. On a global scale, areas with low socio-demographic index (SDI) exhibited the highest increase in DALYs, incidence rates, and prevalence rates for AA from 1990 to 2019, while regions with high SDI observed the most substantial decrease. However, it is noteworthy that high SDI regions continued to bear the highest burden of AA. AA imposes a higher disease burden on women than men within the same age bracket. Young individuals (aged between 25 and 39 years) experience a greater disease burden compared to other age cohorts. Bibliometric analysis reveals that recent research focus in the field of AA primarily revolves around clinical trials and evaluating various treatment modalities such as Janus kinases (JAK) inhibitors and platelet rich plasma. The disease burden of AA may still be on the rise worldwide. This study further validates the gender- and region-specific impacts of AA and its associated burden, offering valuable guidance for prevention strategies and resource allocation. JAK inhibitors and platelet rich plasma are currently favored by researchers, and further high-quality studies are required to assess their long-term efficacy and safety more comprehensively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.