ArticleScientific reports2025
GMS-JIGNet: guided multi-scale jigsaw puzzles for self-supervised artificial spot segmentation in fundus photography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dust and sensor noise often create artificial spots in fundus photography, and clinicians may occasionally misinterpret them as pathological signs such as microaneurysms. Reliable computer-aided diagnosis depends on accurately identifying and segmenting such artifacts. However, producing pixel-level annotations for these subtle structures remains labor-intensive and challenging to scale. We propose GMS-JIGNet, a self-supervised segmentation framework based on guided multi-scale jigsaw puzzles and contrastive learning, to address this issue. The method learns spatially-aware representations from unlabeled data by solving jigsaw puzzles across multiple resolutions while selectively injecting positional hints for uninformative regions. The downstream segmentation model receives these representations and uses the ViT encoders from the pretext task as fixed feature extractors and a lightweight FPN decoder. Experimental results on a large-scale fundus dataset show that our proposed model achieves state-of-the-art performance across various metrics, including IoU, DICE, and SSIM, even when trained with only a few labeled images. Moreover, we conducted ablation studies to assess how well our architecture performs under different training hyperparameter setups. The results support the effectiveness of guided self-supervised learning in medical image segmentation and suggest its strong potential for clinical use, especially in settings with limited labeled data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.