ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-scale machine learning model predicts muscle and functional disease progression.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Arlington study of healthy aging: a multidisciplinary community cohort study of functional decline with age.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Digital Twins for Personalized Medicine Require Epidemiological Data and Mathematical Modeling: Viewpoint.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a genetic neuromuscular disorder characterized by progressive muscle degeneration with substantial variability in severity and progression patterns. FSHD is a highly heterogeneous disease; however, current clinical metrics used for tracking disease progression lack sensitivity for personalized assessment, which greatly limits the design and execution of clinical trials. This study introduces a multi-scale machine learning framework leveraging whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical data to predict regional, muscle, joint, and functional progression in FSHD. The goal this work is to create a 'digital twin' of individual FSHD patients that can be leveraged in clinical trials. Using a combined dataset of over 100 patients from seven studies, MRI-derived metrics-including fat fraction, lean muscle volume, and fat spatial heterogeneity at baseline-were integrated with clinical and functional measures. A three-stage random forest model was developed to predict annualized changes in muscle composition and a functional outcome (timed up-and-go (TUG)). All model stages revealed strong predictive performance in separate holdout datasets. After training, the models predicted fat fraction change with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 2.16% and lean volume change with a RMSE of 8.1 ml in a holdout testing dataset. Feature analysis revealed that metrics of fat heterogeneity within muscle predicts muscle-level progression. The stage 3 model, which combined functional muscle groups, predicted change in TUG with a RMSE of 0.6 s in the holdout testing dataset. This study demonstrates the machine learning models incorporating individual muscle and performance data can effectively predict MRI disease progression and functional performance of complex tasks, addressing the heterogeneity and nonlinearity inherent in FSHD. Further studies incorporating larger longitudinal cohorts, as well as comprehensive clinical and functional measures, will allow for expanding and refining this model. As many neuromuscular diseases are characterized by variability and heterogeneity similar to FSHD, such approaches have broad applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.