ArticleScientific reports2025
Hybrid genetic algorithm and deep learning techniques for advanced side-channel attacks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heuristic centrality methods challenge greedy optimization in influence maximization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- FBCA: Flexible Besiege and Conquer Algorithm for Multi-Layer Perceptron Optimization Problems.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, deep learning-based profiling methods have significantly advanced side-channel analysis, yielding promising results. A critical challenge in training effective neural network models lies in hyperparameter optimization. This research introduces a genetic algorithm (GA) framework that efficiently navigates complex hyperparameter search spaces, overcoming limitations of conventional methods: grid search's poor scalability and Bayesian optimization's challenges with high-dimensional spaces. The GA leverages evolutionary strategies to explore non-differentiable, multimodal optimization landscapes, systematically identifying configurations that maximize model performance. Our evaluation on protected AES implementations demonstrates the framework's effectiveness. Experimental results show the GA-based approach achieves 100% key recovery accuracy across test cases, significantly outperforming random search baselines (70% accuracy). In comprehensive comparisons against Bayesian optimization, reinforcement learning, and tree-structured Parzen estimators, the GA solution achieved top performance in 25% of test cases and ranked second overall. These findings validate genetic algorithms as a robust alternative for optimizing side-channel attack models, offering both scalability and consistent performance across diverse attack scenarios while advancing the state of cryptographic security assessment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.