SynthesisPhlebology2026
A systematic review evaluating imaging techniques to determine chronicity of deep vein thrombosis.
Synthesis in Phlebology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveThe objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the different imaging techniques used to assess thrombus chronicity in patients with deep venous thrombosis (DVT).MethodsA systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, CENTRAL and Web of Science databases was performed to identify meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomised controlled trials or observational studies investigating imaging techniques for assessing DVT chronicity.ResultsOverall, 56 studies were reviewed. Various imaging modalities have been explored to assess DVT chronicity. Ultrasound parameters such as echogenicity and vein diameter proved unreliable, though elastography showed promise by quantifying thrombus stiffness. Computed Tomography (CT) studies were limited. In contrast, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) demonstrated potential for differentiating thrombus age, and nuclear imaging with targeted radiotracers, along with techniques like photoacoustic imaging and Optical coherence tomography (OCT), offered high diagnostic accuracy.ConclusionThis review evaluated various imaging techniques for thrombus aging. No single modality is ideal, but MRI shows the greatest potential for advancement. In select populations, it may enhance cost-effectiveness and improve outcomes for catheter-based DVT interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.