ArticleJoint Commission journal on quality and patient safety2025
Language-Concordant Health Care: Implementation of a Bilingual Competency Program.
Article in Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- When Language is Care.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2026Article
- Article
- Language Access in Healthcare: Aligning Policy and Evidence to Improve Patient Experience Through Professional Interpretation and Language- Concordant Care.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLanguage proficiency among health care professionals is essential for delivering equitable, high-quality care to patients with a non-English language preference (NELP). This study examines how implementing a Bilingual Competency Program (BCP) for diverse clinical staff enhances patient-centered care and improves the health care experience for NELP patients.
methodsThis quality improvement initiative describes implementation of the BCP at an urban cancer center. Staff self-assessed their language skills using the adapted Interagency Language Roundtable Scale for Healthcare (ILR-H) and recorded this in the organization's human resources platform. Those self-rating as excellent attested to their proficiency and enrolled by signing an electronic statement. Those rating themselves as very good or good took an oral proficiency test. Those who passed joined the BCP, while those self-assessing as fair or poor were not included.
resultsA total of 935 employees joined the program, representing 1,087 unique language entries across 67 languages, with Spanish, Mandarin, Russian, and Hindi being most common. Out of 1,087 unique entries, 641 (59.0%) self-assessed as excellent, 269 (24.7%) as very good (75.0% of whom [60/80] passed the proficiency test), and 130 (12.0%) as good (58.8% of whom [20/34] passed). Most participants (71.8%) were in patient-facing roles, and 68.7% held clinical positions. Of 1,087 unique entries, 721 (66.3%) were verified for language proficiency, 641 through self-assessment and 80 through formal testing.
conclusionThe BCP enhances linguistic competency by integrating validated assessments and evidence-based methods, addressing prior program limitations, and setting a new standard for improving health equity, care quality, and outcomes for NELP patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.