Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40670203›Full record

ReviewScience bulletin2025

Liquid biopsy-based multi-cancer early detection: an exploration road from evidence to implementation.

Yongjie Xu, Sibo Zhu, Changfa Xia, Hui Yu, Si Shi, Kezhong Chen, Yue He, Chuxia Deng, Haoxuan Jin, Jing Liu and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science bulletin, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Military Medical Research · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Yongjie XuOffice of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Sibo ZhuShanghai Xiaohe Medical Laboratory Co. Ltd, Shanghai 201321, China.
Changfa XiaOffice of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.
Hui YuShanghai Xiaohe Medical Laboratory Co. Ltd, Shanghai 201321, China.
Si ShiDepartment of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Kezhong ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China; Peking University People's Hospital Thoracic Oncology Institute & Research Unit of Intelligence Diagnosis and Treatment in Early Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Beijing 100044, China.
Yue HeDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China; Peking University People's Hospital Thoracic Oncology Institute & Research Unit of Intelligence Diagnosis and Treatment in Early Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Beijing 100044, China.
Chuxia DengMOE Frontiers Science Center for Precision Oncology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Institute of Translational Medicine, Cancer Center, University of Macau, Macau 999078, China.
Haoxuan JinShanghai Xiaohe Medical Laboratory Co. Ltd, Shanghai 201321, China.
Jing LiuShanghai Xiaohe Medical Laboratory Co. Ltd, Shanghai 201321, China.
Rebecca FitzgeraldEarly Detection Programme, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1TN, UK.
Partha BasuEarly Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, 69007, France.
Wanqing ChenOffice of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China. Electronic address: chenwq@cicams.ac.cn.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current cancer screening methods are limited in scope, often detecting only a few cancer types with low positive predictive value and suboptimal patient adherence. In recent years, liquid biopsy-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) has emerged as a promising approach to revolutionize cancer control. Despite several MCED tests reaching clinical trial phases and seeking regulatory approval, none have yet been approved for clinical use, highlighting uncertainties regarding their efficacy and applicability. This review comprehensively examines the advancements in MCED technologies and offers insights into the selection of cancer types for inclusion in MCED panels. We explore the clinical development pathway for MCED, from biomarker discovery and analytical validation to large-scale randomized controlled trials, emphasizing the importance of selecting appropriate endpoints such as reducing late-stage cancer incidence or cancer-specific mortality. Key challenges, including achieving optimal sensitivity for early-stage cancers, minimizing false positives and negatives, and ensuring equitable access to MCED tests, are also addressed. Finally, we evaluate the added value and health economic benefits of integrating MCED into established healthcare systems through widespread implementation. By providing a thorough analysis of these aspects, this review aims to advance the field of cancer screening and guide future research and development efforts.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerNeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorHumansLiquid BiopsyBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersCancer screeningClinical trialsLiquid biopsyMuti-cancer early detection

Identifiers

PMID40670203
PMCPMC12399432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.