Observational studyNeurologia medico-chirurgica2025
Intraoperative Blood Pressure and Hemorrhagic Complications after Brain Tumor Biopsies: An Observational Study Using a Propensity Score-matched Analysis.
Observational study in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumor biopsies are essential for pathological diagnosis. However, hemorrhagic complications after biopsies may occur, leading to suboptimal outcomes. This study evaluated the relationship between intraoperative blood pressure, especially anesthesia awakening, and hemorrhagic complications after brain tumor biopsies. We retrospectively collected data on consecutive patients with brain tumors (malignant lymphoma or glioma) who underwent a biopsy from 2011 to 2020. During the first half of the study period (until 2015), we managed patients with a mild blood pressure-lowering policy during awakening from general anesthesia, while in the latter half (after 2016), we aggressively lowered blood pressure below 140 mmHg. This blood pressure management was performed as a best practice. After propensity score matching using logistic regression analysis, 122 patients were included. With the aggressive blood pressure-lowering policy, the values of blood pressure-related parameters during the recovery from general anesthesia were drastically reduced (median maximum blood pressures were 165 [mmHg] until 2015 vs. 135 after 2016, p < 0.001). Accordingly, the overall bleeding rate decreased after 2016 (ALL bleeding, 54.1 vs. 31.1%, p = 0.017; symptomatic bleeding, 16.4% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.154). Abrupt blood pressure rise during anesthesia awakening (mmHg/min) was significantly associated with symptomatic postsurgical hemorrhages (p = 0.012). An aggressive blood pressure-lowering policy reduced blood pressure during recovery from general anesthesia and the overall bleeding rates. Avoiding rapid blood pressure rises during anesthesia awakening may be necessary by focusing on both blood pressure and the speed of any changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.