Observational studyBMJ open ophthalmology2025
Characterising corneal changes in aniridia-related keratopathy using in vivo confocal microscopy and a self-supervised AI model.
Observational study in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate whether corneal changes observed via in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in patients with aniridia-related keratopathy (ARK) reflect clinical severity.
methodsA cross-sectional, observational study. Patients with congenital aniridia and healthy controls were included. IVCM of the epithelium, anterior stroma and posterior stroma were collected, manually annotated and analysed using the pretrained DINOv2 model as a feature extractor. High-dimensional embeddings were visualised using t-distributed stochastic neighbour embedding (t-SNE) to assess layer-specific clustering. Structural deviations from normal controls were quantified using centroid and Euclidean distance metrics. The cumulative structural changes across corneal layers were then correlated with Ocular Surface Score (OSS), a clinical grading scale for ARK severity.
results20 patients with congenital aniridia and six healthy controls were included. t-SNE analysis revealed distinct clusters for normal corneal layers; whereas, ARK samples displayed overlapping clusters, suggestive of blurred structural boundaries. Notably, significant clustering patterns were observed in the anterior stroma, even in cases with mild ARK, underscoring its potential as an early disease marker. Anterior stromal changes were significantly associated with OSS scores (p<0.05), while cumulative structural deviations across all layers demonstrated a stronger correlation with disease severity (p<0.01). The posterior stroma showed relative structural preservation, aligning closely with healthy controls.
conclusionDINOv2 is a useful tool for identifying subtle structural changes in corneal layers affected by ARK. The corneal stromal features characterised using IVCM showed strong associations with clinical disease and may serve as structural biomarkers of clinical disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.