Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40669926›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Impostor syndrome, associated factors and impact on well-being across medical undergraduates and postgraduate medical professionals: a scoping review.

Shi Min Chua, Isac Yih Kiat Tan, Matthias Enrui Thummachai, Qian Hui Chew, Kang Sim

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shi Min ChuaNUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore.
Isac Yih Kiat TanNUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore.
Matthias Enrui ThummachaiNUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore.
Qian Hui ChewResearch Division, Institute of Mental Health, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0969-7994
Kang SimNUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore kang_sim@imh.com.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3209-9626

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesImpostor syndrome (IS) is a psychological state whereby individuals doubt their abilities despite evidence of competence. Though IS has been studied in specific medical groups, no review to date compares findings across groups. This study aimed to: (1) determine the range of IS rates among medical undergraduates versus postgraduates and (2) examine associated factors across both groups.

designThis scoping review used the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews, using a five-step framework. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Scopus and PsycINFO databases were searched from inception until September 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were included if they were (1) empirical studies with a defined IS rating scale, (2) involving medical undergraduates, residents or clinicians and (3) published in English. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Three independent reviewers used standardised methods to screen and review selected studies, and extract key variables.

results54 studies (77.8% from the West) were included. There was equal study distribution between undergraduates (46.3%, 25 studies) and postgraduates (46.3%, 25 studies), with the rest covering both groups. IS prevalence was substantial across all groups when assessed using the Clance Impostor Phenomenon Scale, ranging from 30.6% to 75.9% among undergraduates, 33.0% to 75.0% among residents and 23.5% to 50.0% among faculty and clinicians. In undergraduates, IS was associated with learning breaks, transition periods and poor academic performance. Among postgraduates, IS was correlated with younger age, junior ranking, fewer work years, inadequate faculty support or self-perceived poor clinical and teaching skills. Additionally, IS affected physical and psychological well-being (stress, anxiety, depression, burnout) and was associated with sociodemographic factors (single status, females), personality (neuroticism, perfectionistic traits, with conscientiousness, agreeableness and extraversion as protective) and interpersonal issues (conflicts, poor sense of belonging).

conclusionsGiven the high IS prevalence and associations with specific factors, practical measures are recommended to address IS and optimise learning and care for medical undergraduates and professionals.

Indexed as

Students, MedicalAnxiety DisordersEducation, Medical, UndergraduateHumansSelf ConceptEducation, MedicalMEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAININGMENTAL HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID40669926
PMCPMC12273176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.