Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40669912›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Sustained natural immunity following SARS-CoV-2 infection against severe COVID-19 outcomes and symptomatic reinfection: analyses of national data for Brazil and Scotland.

Fasih Haider, Thiago Cerqueira-Silva, Kirsten J Hainey, Tristan Millington, Syed Ahmar Shah, Vincius de Araujo Oliveira, Neil Pearce, Mauricio L Barreto, Viviane Sampaio Boaventura, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Fasih Haider *Usher Institute, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5150-3359
Thiago Cerqueira-Silva *Laboratório de Medicina e Saúde Pública de Precisão, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Kirsten J Hainey *MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6229-4556
Tristan MillingtonPublic Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Syed Ahmar ShahUsher Institute, the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5672-0443
Vincius de Araujo OliveiraCenter of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (Cidacs), Fiocruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Neil PearceMedical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9938-7852
Mauricio L BarretoCenter of Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (Cidacs), Fiocruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Viviane Sampaio BoaventuraLaboratório de Medicina e Saúde Pública de Precisão, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi *MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-9092
Chris Robertson *Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
Manoel Barral-Netto *Laboratório de Medicina e Saúde Pública de Precisão, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Salvador, Brazil.
Aziz Sheikh *Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK aziz.sheikh@phc.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7022-3056

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSARS-CoV-2 infection provides protection against reinfection and severe COVID-19 disease; however, this protective effect may diminish over time. We assessed waning of natural immunity conferred by previous infection against severe disease and symptomatic reinfection in Brazil and Scotland.

designWe undertook a test-negative design study and nested case-control analysis to estimate waning of natural immunity against severe COVID-19 outcomes and symptomatic reinfection using national linked datasets. We used logistic regression to estimate ORs with 95% CIs. A stratified analysis assessed immunity during the Omicron dominant period in Brazil. SETTING AND

participantsWe included data from the adult populations of Brazil and Scotland from 1 June 2020 to 30 April 2022. OUTCOME MEASURES: Severe COVID-19 was defined as hospitalisation or death. Reinfection was defined as reverse-transcriptase PCR or rapid antigen test confirmed at least 120 days after primary infection.

resultsFrom Brazil, we included 30 881 873 tests and 1 301 665 severe COVID-19 outcomes, and from Scotland, we included 1 520 201 tests and 7988 severe COVID-19 outcomes. Against severe outcomes, sustained protection was observed for at least 12 months after primary SARS-CoV-2 infection with little evidence of waning: <6 months postprimary infection: Brazil OR 0.10 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.11), Scotland OR 0.01 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.05); >12 months postprimary infection: Brazil OR 0.12 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.14), Scotland OR 0.03 (95% CI 0.02 to 0.04). For symptomatic reinfection, Brazilian data demonstrated evidence of waning in the 12 months following primary infection, although some residual protection remained beyond 12 months: <6 months postprimary infection: OR 0.19 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.20); >12 months postprimary infection: OR 0.42 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.43). The greatest reduction in risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was in individuals with hybrid immunity (history of previous infection and vaccination), with sustained protection against severe outcomes at 12 months postprimary infection. During the Omicron dominant period in Brazil, odds of symptomatic reinfection were higher and increased more quickly over time when compared with the overall study period, although protection against severe outcomes was sustained at 12 months postprimary infection (whole study: OR 0.12 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.14); Omicron phase: OR 0.15 (95% CI 0.12 to 0.19)).

conclusionCross-national analyses demonstrate sustained protection against severe COVID-19 disease for at least 12 months following natural SARS-CoV-2 infection, with vaccination further enhancing protection. Protection against symptomatic reinfection was lower with evidence of waning, but there remained a protective effect beyond 12 months from primary infection.

Indexed as

COVID-19ReinfectionSARS-CoV-2AdultAgedBrazilCase-Control StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedScotlandSeverity of Illness IndexCOVID-19EpidemiologyPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID40669912
PMCPMC12273164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.