Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40669902›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Centrifugation versus filtration-based cell salvage: impact on perioperative bleeding in cardiac surgery-the COLTRANE randomised clinical trial - study protocol.

Antoine Beurton, Alexandre Mansour, Antoine Benard, Mathieu Pernot, Victor-Emmanuel Brett, Corinne Batsale, Anais Aitgougam, Anais Cordon, Christine Mouton, Aurelie Fresselinat and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06425614 (Centrifugation-based Versus Filtration-based Intraoperative Cell Salvage on Quality of Perioperative Haemostasis in Cardiac Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06425614 narecruitingnot on this map

Centrifugation-based Versus Filtration-based Intraoperative Cell Salvage on Quality of Perioperative Haemostasis in Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BordeauxRan2024 to 2027Enrolled570ConditionsOn-pump Cardiac Surgery, High Risk for Bleeding, AutotransfusionArmsAutotransfusion
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Antoine BeurtonDepartment of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Critical Care, CHU Bordeaux, Haut-Lévêque hospital, Bordeaux, France antoine.beurton@chu-bordeaux.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3708-4653
Alexandre MansourDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Pontchaillou, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Antoine BenardService d'Information Médicale, Clinical Epidemiology Unit (USMR), CHU Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Bordeaux, France.
Mathieu PernotDepartment of Cardiology and Cardio-Vascular Surgery, CHU Bordeaux, Haut-Lévêque hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Victor-Emmanuel BrettHematology Laboratory, Reference Center for Inherited Platelet Disorders, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Corinne BatsaleDepartment of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Critical Care, CHU Bordeaux, Haut-Lévêque hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Anais AitgougamClinical Pharmacy of Medical Devices, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Anais CordonService d'Information Médicale, Clinical Epidemiology Unit (USMR), CHU Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé Publique, Bordeaux, France.
Christine MoutonHematology Laboratory, Reference Center for Inherited Platelet Disorders, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Aurelie FresselinatClinical Pharmacy of Medical Devices, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Geraldine RobertClinical Research Manager, Internal Promotion. Clinical Research and Innovation Department, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Julien ImbaultDepartment of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Critical Care, CHU Bordeaux, Haut-Lévêque hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Nicolas NesselerDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Pontchaillou, Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Alexandre OuattaraDepartment of Cardiovascular Anesthesia and Critical Care, CHU Bordeaux, Haut-Lévêque hospital, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiac surgery remains a high-risk procedure for bleeding despite advances in patient blood management. Conventional centrifugation-based autotransfusion devices primarily recover red blood cells, losing platelets and coagulation factors. The SAME autotransfusion device (i-SEP, Nantes, France) introduces an innovative filtration-based approach, recovering erythrocytes, leucocytes and platelets to enhance perioperative haemostasis. The main objective is to determine whether the filtration-based SAME device reduces significant perioperative bleeding compared with the centrifugation-based system in high-risk cardiac surgery patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Centrifugation-based vs filtration-based intraOperative cell saLvage on qualiTy of peRioperAtive haemostasis iN cardiac surgEry (COLTRANE) trial is a multicentre, parallel-group, single-blinded, superiority-randomised clinical trial. Conducted over 19 months in 10 French hospitals, the study will target patients at high risk of bleeding undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery via sternotomy. A total of 570 patients (285 per group) are required to achieve 80% statistical power for detecting clinically significant differences. Eligible patients will be randomised to either a centrifugation-based or filtration-based autotransfusion group. Both groups will follow standardised perioperative and cardiopulmonary bypass management, with the devices used only intraoperatively. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with clinically significant perioperative bleeding defined as classes 2 to 4 of the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding. The secondary outcomes include device efficiency and safety, perioperative haemostasis, lengths of intensive care unit and hospital stays, early postoperative morbidity and 30-day all-cause mortality. Ancillary studies will be performed to evaluate cell recovery and washing performance, the viscoelastic properties of retransfused blood (Quantra Qplus; Stago, Asnières-sur-Seine, France), and the effect of salvaged leucocytes on postoperative inflammation and immune function. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial has received a favourable opinion from the Committee for the Protection of Persons and authorisation from the French authorities (Comité de protection des personnes Nord Ouest, IDRCB: 2023-A02566-39). Protocol V.1.1 was approved on 22 January 2024. The trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06425614). The findings will be disseminated through oral communications at national and international scientific meetings and peer-reviewed journal publications. Individual participant data will be made available on reasonable request to qualified researchers, following review and approval by the study sponsor and ethics committee. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06425614.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalBlood Transfusion, AutologousCardiac Surgical ProceduresFiltrationOperative Blood SalvageCentrifugationEquivalence Trials as TopicFranceHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodAdult intensive & critical careAnaesthesia in cardiologyBleeding disorders & coagulopathiesBlood bank & transfusion medicineCardiac surgery

Identifiers

PMID40669902
PMCPMC12273169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.