Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40669893›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Development of START-EDI guidelines for reporting equality, diversity and inclusion in research: a study protocol.

Michael G Fadel, Hannah Kettley-Linsell, Piers R Boshier, Rebecca Barnes, Christopher Newby, Anthony Muchai Manyara, Peter Buckle, Darshali A Vyas, Julie Hepburn, Philip Edgar-Jones and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Michael G FadelDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK m.fadel@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3305-4270
Hannah Kettley-LinsellDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Piers R BoshierDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Rebecca BarnesDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Christopher NewbyNIHR Research Support Service Hub, University of Leicester and Partners, Leicester, UK.
Anthony Muchai ManyaraGlobal Health and Ageing Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Peter BuckleDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Darshali A VyasDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Julie HepburnPublic Involvement Community, Health and Care Research Wales Support Centre, Cardiff, UK.
Philip Edgar-JonesSky Arts and Entertainment, London, UK.
Tanvi RaiNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Brian D NicholsonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0661-7362
Amanda J CrossDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Linda D SharplesDepartment of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0894-966X
Sally HopewellOxford Clinical Trials Research Unit / Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6881-6984
Jérémie F CohenCentre of Research in Epidemiology and Statistics (CRESS), INSERM, OPPaLE Research Team, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Vivian WelchMethods Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5238-7097
Patrick Mm BossuytDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
George B HannaDepartment of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAcknowledging equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in research is not only a moral imperative but also an important step in avoiding bias and ensuring generalisability of results. This protocol describes the development of STAndards for ReporTing EDI (START-EDI) in research, which will provide a set of minimum standards to help researchers improve their consistency, completeness and transparency in EDI reporting. We anticipate that these guidelines will benefit authors, reviewers, editors, funding organisations, healthcare providers, patients and the public. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: To create START-EDI reporting guidelines, the following five stages are proposed: (i) establish a diverse, multidisciplinary Steering Committee that will lead and coordinate guideline development; (ii) a systematic review to identify the essential principles and methodological approaches for EDI to generate preliminary checklist items; (iii) conduct an international Delphi process to reach a consensus on the checklist items; (iv) finalise the reporting guidelines and create a separate explanation and elaboration document; and (v) broad dissemination and implementation of START-EDI guidelines. We will work with patient and public involvement representatives and under-served groups in research throughout the project stages. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval from the Imperial College London Research Ethics Committee (study ID: 7592283). The reporting guidelines will be published in open access peer-reviewed publications and presented in international conferences, and disseminated through community networks and forums. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The project is pre-registered within the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/8udbq/) and the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research Network.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCultural DiversityGuidelines as TopicResearch DesignDelphi TechniqueHumansSystematic Reviews as TopicDelphi TechniqueHealth EquityProtocols & guidelines

Identifiers

PMID40669893
PMCPMC12273130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.