ArticleContemporary clinical trials2025
Rationale and design of the rheumatoid arthritis non-responders to treatment (RANT) study: Use of a bioinformatics platform and "decentralized" clinical recruitment design.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05447182 (People-Powered Medicine), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
People-Powered Medicine (PPM): Rheumatoid Arthritis Non-responders to Biologic Therapies (RANT)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Rheumatoid Arthritis Non-responders to Treatment (RANT) study (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05447182) uses a novel bioinformatics platform to facilitate a "decentralized" patient oriented clinical study. The goal is to identify genetic factors associated with inadequate response to biologic and targeted synthetic rheumatoid arthritis (RA) medications. The study was advertised through social media, research website postings, and targeted recruitment of potentially eligible patients in academic practices and existing RA research registries. Interested RA patients who failed two or more biologic or targeted synthetic RA therapies completed a self-directed online informed consent and questionnaires on RA treatment history and granted access to electronic health records through a third-party vendor. After confirming eligibility by reviewing participant responses, participants received a blood sample kit by mail, had blood sample tubes drawn locally, and returned the kit by mail to the study genomic lab for whole genome sequencing. The study enrolled 164 eligible patients. The majority of eligible participants were identified through an established RA research registry (n = 101, 61.6 %) and through clinic recruitment at academic practices (n = 47, 28.7 %). Of the participants who were mailed a blood kit, 118/130 (90.7 %) returned the kit with blood sample by mail. Clinical and genetic factors of RA treatment non-responders will be compared to RA treatment responders from established research cohorts. This study demonstrates the feasibility of decentralized patient-oriented clinical studies in medicine, and highlights the importance of "traditional" recruitment methods like patient registries and academic practices. Future study results will identify potential clinical and genetic predictors of treatment refractory RA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.