ArticleEuropean heart journal2025
Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography to predict regurgitant valvular heart diseases: an international study.
Article in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- "Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Evaluating Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".Clinical cardiology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence technology in aortic valve disease: a decade of scientometric and narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Unimodal to multimodal: a systematic review of predictive machine learning models for valvular heart diseases.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- A bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence applications in heart failure.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Association of Valvular Disease Progression Using Echocardiographic Findings in a Large U.S. Cohort.Echocardiography (Mount Kisco, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Foundation model for screening severe mitral regurgitation and severe aortic stenosis from coronary angiograms.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2026Article
- Deep Learning and Cardiovascular Diseases: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- AI-ECG for Echocardiography Triage in Structural Heart Disease: Evidence, Implementation, and Future Directions.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Precision Medicine for Electrocardiogram Interpretation: Clinical Relevance, Challenges, and Advances.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- The electrocardiogram reimagined: AI-ECG as a prognostic beacon for valvular heart disease.European heart journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsValvular heart disease (VHD) is a significant source of morbidity and mortality, though early intervention can improve outcomes. This study aims to develop artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography (AI-ECG) models to diagnose and predict future moderate or severe regurgitant VHDs (rVHDs), including mitral regurgitation (MR), tricuspid regurgitation (TR), and aortic regurgitation (AR).
methodsThe AI-ECG models were developed in a data set of 988 618 ECG and transthoracic echocardiogram pairs from 400 882 patients from Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai, China. The AI-ECG models used a residual convolutional neural network with a discrete-time survival loss function. External evaluation was performed in outpatients from a secondary care data set from Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, USA, consisting of 34 214 patients with linked echocardiography.
resultsIn the internal test set, the AI-ECG models accurately predicted future significant MR [C-index 0.774, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.753-0.792], AR (0.691, 95% CI 0.657-0.720), and TR (0.793, 95% CI 0.777-0.808). In age- and sex-adjusted Cox models, the highest risk quartile had a hazard ratio (HR) of 7.6 (95% CI 5.8-9.9, P < .0001) for risk of future significant MR, compared with the lowest risk quartile. For future AR and TR, the equivalent HRs were 3.8 (95% CI 2.7-5.5) and 9.9 (95% CI 7.5-13.0), respectively. These findings were confirmed in the transnational external test set. Imaging association analyses demonstrated AI-ECG predictions were associated with subclinical chamber remodelling.
conclusionsThis study developed AI-ECG models to diagnose and predict rVHDs and validated the models in a transnational and ethnically distinct cohort. The AI-ECG models could be utilized to guide surveillance echocardiography in patients at risk of future rVHDs, to facilitate early detection and intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.