ReviewAnnual review of genetics2025
Gene Editing Applications as Future Cardiovascular Therapies.
Review in Annual review of genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Next-Generation Bone Marrow Cell Therapies for Cardiac Repair: Integrating Gene Therapy and Bioengineering to Enhance Therapeutic Potency.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Review
- Precision modification of heart failure signaling by CRISPR-Cas9 base editing.Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Genetic Epidemiology in the Genome-Wide Era: From Association Discovery to Mechanistic Dissection and Clinical Translation.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Review
- Ablation of PKCα Phosphorylation by CRISPR-Cas9 Base Editing Rescues Heart Failure.Circulation research · 2026Article
- Organoids for disease modeling and treatment: state-of-the-art.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, despite advances in pharmacological and surgical interventions. The emergence of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technology offers promising approaches for correcting genetic causes of hereditary cardiovascular disorders and modulating pathogenic signaling pathways implicated in various heart diseases. However, several challenges with respect to in vivo delivery of gene editing components, as well as important safety considerations, remain to be addressed in the path toward possible clinical application. We review current gene editing strategies, their potential therapeutic applications in the context of a variety of cardiovascular disorders, and their respective merits, limitations, and regulatory considerations. The rapid advances in this field combined with the many opportunities for deploying gene editing therapies for cardiovascular disorders augur well for the future of this transformative technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.