ArticleMaturitas2025
Incidence of de novo migraine after premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy.
Article in Maturitas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Neurology of Menopause.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveLittle is known about the effects of premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy on the development of migraine. We compared migraine outcomes for women undergoing oophorectomy with those of referent women. STUDY
designThe cohort included 1243 women who underwent premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy in Olmsted County, MN, US between 1988 and 2007 and 1415 age-matched (±1 year) referent women. Women diagnosed with migraine before oophorectomy (or index) were excluded. Estrogen therapy after oophorectomy was assessed as a time-dependent factor.
resultsWomen who underwent oophorectomy had an increased risk of de novo migraine compared with referent women (HR, 1.59; 95 % CI, 1.24-2.05). The risk was particularly higher for women who underwent oophorectomy under the age of 45 years. An increased risk of migraine without aura, but not of migraine with aura, was observed, as is characteristic of menstrual migraines. The risk of de novo migraine in the women with oophorectomy off estrogen was comparable to that of the referent women (HR, 0.80; 95 % CI, 0.43-1.52). By contrast, women with oophorectomy on estrogen had an increased risk of migraine (HR, 2.08; 95 % CI, 1.47-2.92).
conclusionsPremenopausal bilateral oophorectomy is associated with an increased risk of migraine. Although estrogen is known to mitigate the severity of menopause-related symptoms, the higher risk for migraine among women using estrogen could be the result of them being prescribed estrogen because of greater severity of menopause symptoms. We encourage future studies to examine how the type, dose, and route of estrogen impact migraine outcomes after oophorectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.