ReviewPhysics of life reviews2025
Computational models of peripersonal space representation.
Review in Physics of life reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Peripersonal space (PPS) is the region of space near the body, the multisensory interface where interactions with the environment predominantly occur. This space is represented by a specialized neural system that integrates tactile and external stimuli as a function of their distance from the body. Previous studies uncovered plastic and dynamical properties of PPS representation, links between PPS encoding and higher-level cognitive functions (e.g., social cognition), as well as its alterations in neurological and psychiatric disorders. These findings have expanded the definition of PPS and have led to the development of an array of computational models of PPS, addressing the why and how of PPS encoding. Although computational models are crucial for advancing our mechanistic and functional understanding of PPS representation, no prior work has reviewed these models. Here, we address this gap by analysing computational models of PPS, and proposing a taxonomy to classify them based on their level of description, capacity to reproduce empirical findings, and ability to generate novel predictions. This effort leads us to propose that PPS may be best understood as a system that detects spatiotemporal regularities in body-environment interactions, in order to predict potential future interactions. Hence, we suggest re-defining PPS as a unified spatiotemporal field that integrates not only spatial dimensions, but also temporal ones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.