Trial reportJMIR dermatology2025
Effectiveness of a Machine Learning-Enabled Skincare Recommendation for Mild-to-Moderate Acne Vulgaris: 8-Week Evaluator-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in JMIR dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance, Clinical Applications, and Implementation Challenges (2003-2025).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acne vulgaris (AV) is one of the most common skin disorders, with a peak incidence in adolescence and early adulthood. Topical treatments are usually used for mild to moderate AV; however, a lack of adherence to topical treatment is seen in patients due to various reasons. Therefore, personalized skincare recommendations may be beneficial for treating mild-to-moderate AV. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel machine learning approach in predicting the optimal treatment for mild-to-moderate AV based on self-assessment and objective measures. Methods: A randomized, evaluator-blinded, parallel-group study was conducted on 100 patients recruited from an internet-based database and randomized in a 1:1 ratio (groups A and B) based on their consent form submission. Groups A and B received customized product recommendations using a Bayesian machine learning model and self-selected treatments, respectively. The patients submitted self-assessed disease scores and photographs after the 8-week treatment. The primary and secondary outcomes were photograph evaluation by two board-certified dermatologists using the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) scores and quality of life (QoL) measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), respectively. Results: Overall, 99 patients were screened, and 68 patients (mean age: 27 years, SD 4.56 years) were randomized into groups A (customized) and B (self-selected). IGA scores significantly improved after treatment in group A but not in group B (mean difference in IGA score; group A=0.32, P=.04 vs group B=0.09, P=.54). The DLQI significantly improved in group A from 7.75 at baseline to 3.5 (P<.001) after treatment but reduced in group B from 7.53 to 5.3 (P>.05). IGA scores and the DLQI were significantly correlated in group A, but not in group B. A total of 3 patients reported adverse reactions in group B, but none in group A. Conclusions: Using a machine learning model for personalized skincare recommendations significantly reduced symptoms and improved severity and overall QoL of patients with mild-to-moderate AV, supporting the potential of machine learning-based personalized treatment options in dermatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.