ArticleJMIR human factors2025
Factors Influencing Health Workers' Acceptance of Guideline-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems for Preventive Services in Thailand: Questionnaire-Based Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: A guideline-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) is a knowledge-based system designed to collect crucial data from electronic medical records to generate decision-making based on system data requirements and inputs from standard guidelines. Despite the potential to enhance health care delivery, the adoption rate of CDSSs in clinical practice remains suboptimal. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the determinants influencing the intention to use a new CDSS in preventive care within clinical practice. Methods: A single-center, questionnaire-based, cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians and medical students responsible for providing comprehensive preventive services at the Continuity of Care Clinic, Siriraj Hospital, Thailand. Results: In total, 89 participants were enrolled. Relationships between factors impacting the adoption of CDSSs were analyzed using correlation and regression analysis. We found that physicians' intentions to adopt the CDSS for preventive care were high, with 79% (70/89) of participants expressing their intention to use the system. According to the study's conceptual framework, modified from the original unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model, physicians' positive attitudes toward CDSS use in preventive services and a high level of effort expectancy emerged as crucial factors influencing the intention to use the new CDSS. The odds ratios for these factors were 5.44 (95% CI 1.62-18.34, P=.006) and 7.60 (95% CI 1.55-31.37, P=.01), respectively. Similar results were observed for medical students and for physicians who had graduated. The most prevalent barriers to CDSS implementation were related to physicians' attitudes, followed by issues such as the accuracy and burden of data input, time constraints for clinicians, and the risk of workflow disruption. Conclusions: There was a high intention to adopt the CDSS in preventive care. Positive physician attitudes toward CDSS use in preventive services and effort expectancy were found to be critical factors influencing the intention to use the new CDSS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.