ArticlePLoS genetics2025
Genetic and environmental influences on the distributions of three chromosomal drive haplotypes in maize.
Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The evolutionary genomics of meiotic drive.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Meiotic drive elements are regions of the genome that are transmitted to progeny at frequencies that exceed Mendelian expectations, often to the detriment of the organism. In maize there are three prevalent chromosomal drive elements known as Abnormal chromosome 10 (Ab10), K10L2, and the B chromosome. There has been much speculation about how these drivers might interact with each other and the environment in traditional maize landraces and their teosinte ancestors. Here we used genotype-by-sequencing data to score more than 10,000 maize and teosinte lines for the presence or absence of each driver. Fewer than ~0.5% of modern inbred lines carry chromosomal drivers. In contrast, among individuals from 5331 open-pollinated landraces, 6.32% carried Ab10, 5.16% carried K10L2, and 12.28% carried at least one B chromosome. These frequencies are consistent with those reported in previous studies. Using a GWAS approach we identified unlinked loci that associate with the presence or absence of the selfish genetic elements. Many significant SNPs are positively associated with the drivers, suggesting that there may have been selection for alleles that ameliorate their negative fitness consequences. We then assessed the contributions of population structure, associated loci, and the environment on the distribution of each chromosomal driver. There was no significant relationship between any chromosomal driver and altitude, contrary to conclusions based on smaller studies. Our data suggest that the distribution of the major chromosomal drivers is primarily influenced by neutral processes and the deleterious fitness consequences of the drivers themselves. While each driver has a unique relationship to genetic background and the environment, they are largely unconstrained by either.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.