Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40668856›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Validating and prioritizing prenatal breastfeeding education recommendations: A nominal group technique study with postnatal mothers and healthcare professionals.

Jennifer Kehinde, Claire O'Donnell, Annmarie Grealish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jennifer KehindeSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Claire O'DonnellSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2386-7048
Annmarie GrealishSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4559-8520

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIreland has the lowest breastfeeding rates in Europe, with only 60% of mothers initiating breastfeeding after giving birth, a figure that drops to 43% three months later, highlighting challenges in promoting the initiation and continuation of breastfeeding due to inadequate antenatal breastfeeding education. Our previous qualitative study revealed a disconnect between idealized prenatal breastfeeding educational approaches and the realities of maternal breastfeeding experiences, prompting a call for practical, interactive education that addresses emotional resilience, societal dynamics, and partner involvement. This study refines and prioritizes these recommendations using the Nominal Group Technique, providing insights for integrating practical content, interactive strategies, and standardized guidance into frameworks aligned with the WHO's 10 Steps to Successful Breastfeeding.

methodsThis study utilized the Nominal Group Technique to prioritize and evaluate recommendations for improving prenatal breastfeeding education in Ireland, gathering insights from separate sessions with postnatal mothers (n = 6) and healthcare professionals (n = 4). Data analysis was performed using Ritchie's framework for qualitative content analysis and conducted with NVivo (Version 14; QSR, 2024). The study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) to ensure transparency and rigor in its reporting.

resultsThis study identified key recommendations for improving prenatal breastfeeding education through a consensus-building process involving postpartum mothers and healthcare professionals. Mothers emphasized the importance of a balanced approach, including benefits, challenges, and mental support, advocating for personalized learning, interactive group sessions, and standardized guidance. They also highlighted the need for partner involvement and strategies to address societal breastfeeding barriers. Healthcare professionals evaluated the feasibility of integrating these recommendations into Ireland's existing prenatal breastfeeding education framework and their alignment with the WHO's 10 Steps to Successful Breastfeeding. They endorsed the inclusion of balanced educational content and suggested flexible methods, such as recorded sessions, to encourage partner participation and public breastfeeding support. Although there were some differences in implementation strategies, both groups recognized the importance of these recommendations, offering valuable insights for improving prenatal breastfeeding education frameworks.

conclusionThis study highlights the critical need to advance prenatal breastfeeding education in a manner that more effectively supports postnatal mothers while maintaining coherence with existing healthcare frameworks. Findings illustrate a shared commitment among postnatal mothers and healthcare professionals to adopt a more balanced educational model that integrates emotional preparedness, personalized learning pathways, and consistent, standardized messaging. By advocating for the inclusion of partner engagement and addressing broader societal challenges, such as breastfeeding in public, the study promotes a comprehensive and contextually responsive approach to improving maternal and infant health outcomes. Grounded in the WHO's 10 Steps to Successful Breastfeeding, the study provides actionable, evidence-based recommendations for enhancing the delivery of prenatal breastfeeding education within the Irish health system.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingHealth PersonnelMothersPrenatal EducationAdultFemaleHumansIrelandPregnancyQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID40668856
PMCPMC12266410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.