ArticlePloS one2025
Rationale and design of randomized non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor monotherapy with dual antiplatelet therapy in chronic coronary syndrome patients post percutaneous coronary intervention (TICALONE-TAHA10 Protocol).
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06509893 (A Single-center, Randomized, 6-month, Non-inferiority Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of TICAgreLor mONotherapy Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Coronary Syndrome Patients Post Percutaneous Coronary IntErvention), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Single-center, Randomized, 6-month, Non-inferiority Study to Compare the Safety and Efficacy of TICAgreLor mONotherapy Versus Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Coronary Syndrome Patients Post Percutaneous Coronary IntErvention (TICALONE)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the wide variety of antiplatelet regimens and durations, the optimal treatment approach for chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients remains a subject of ongoing debate. While current guidelines recommend dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel, the development of drug-eluting stents (DES) and more potent agents has sparked interest in shorter DAPT regimens, followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy, as a potential alternative. Recent trials and meta-analyses have shown that this approach may provide similar protection against thrombotic events with reduced bleeding risk. Despite promising data, the safety and efficacy of Ticagrelor monotherapy specifically in CCS patients have not been rigorously tested in randomized trials.
methodsTICALONE is a non-inferiority, two-arm, double-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor monotherapy compared to DAPT in CCS patients following PCI. Eligible patients undergoing PCI with drug-eluting stents will be randomly assigned to receive either conventional DAPT (aspirin and clopidogrel) or ticagrelor monotherapy for six months. Follow-up visits will be conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-PCI to assess efficacy and safety endpoints. The primary efficacy endpoint is a composite endpoint of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, and the need for revascularization. The primary safety endpoint is the occurrence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding events. The secondary endpoints include components of the primary efficacy endpoint, any bleeding event (BARC type 1-5), and all-cause mortality. Ancillary endpoints are other adverse events including dyspnea, drug adherence, and reaction. All endpoints will be monitored by a Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) and Trial Management Committee (TMC). Statistical analysis and reporting of trial results will follow the estimand framework. Kaplan-Meier estimates will be used to assess event rates, while the log-rank test and Cox regression analysis will be employed to compare safety and efficacy outcomes between the groups. DISCUSSION: This trial may serve as a crucial step toward eliminating aspirin from post-PCI regimens, specifically in CCS patients. By comparing the safety and efficacy of Ticagrelor monotherapy with the conventional DAPT regimen and addressing potential risks of aspirin-free therapy and adverse events like dyspnea, this study could offer valuable insights into the possibility of P2Y12 monotherapy's safe adoption in this population.
trial registrationTICALONE is registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ with the identifier NCT06509893.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.