ArticlePloS one2025
Hybrid feature selection framework for enhanced credit card fraud detection using machine learning models.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic payment methods are increasingly prevalent worldwide, facilitating both in-person and online transactions. As credit card usage for online payments grows, fraud and payment defaults have also risen, resulting in significant financial losses. Detecting fraudulent transactions is challenging due to the highly imbalanced nature of transaction datasets, where fraudulent activities constitute only a small fraction of the data. To address this, we propose a novel hybrid feature selection framework designed to enhance the performance of machine learning models in credit card fraud detection. Our framework integrates three complementary feature selection techniques: Pearson correlation, information gain (IG), and random forest importance (RFI), each optimized for the dataset's characteristics. Pearson Correlation eliminates redundancy by removing highly correlated features, while IG and RFI evaluate the relevance of the remaining features. A union operation combines the most informative features from these methods, ensuring comprehensive and efficient feature selection. To validate the proposed approach, we test it on five diverse datasets with varying characteristics and imbalance levels, employing five state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms: Random Forest (RF), Extra Trees (ET), XGBoost (XGBC), AdaBoost, and CatBoost. We primarily propose this work for PCA-transformed datasets, but for the validation of our research, we also apply it to a real-world dataset. The results demonstrate that our methodology outperforms existing baseline approaches, achieving superior fraud detection performance across all datasets. Our findings highlight the robustness and adaptability of the proposed framework, offering a practical solution for real-world fraud detection systems. Additionally, we believe that our proposed framework can serve as a decision support system for the detection of fraudulent transactions in real-time credit cards, with the potential to make a substantial contribution to the business industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.