Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40668848›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

"It's because they're my kids, and I love them": Substance use disorders' impact on children and families: A secondary analysis.

Meghan K Ford, Ryan Truong, Ayesha Shakeel, Bruce Knox, Susan Bartels, Colleen Davison, Michele Cole, Logan Jackson, Eva Purkey, Imaan Bayoumi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Meghan K FordDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Ryan TruongSchool of Medicine, Queen's University, 80 Barrie Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Ayesha ShakeelSchool of Medicine, Queen's University, 80 Barrie Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Bruce KnoxDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, 220 Bagot Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 5E9, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1564-7272
Susan BartelsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Queen's University, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 4V7, Canada.
Colleen DavisonDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, 62 Fifth Field Company Lane, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Michele ColeDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, 220 Bagot Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 5E9, Canada.
Logan JacksonDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, 220 Bagot Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 5E9, Canada.
Eva PurkeyDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, 220 Bagot Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 5E9, Canada.
Imaan BayoumiDepartment of Family Medicine, Queen's University, 220 Bagot Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 5E9, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7575-1720

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSubstance use disorders (SUD) significantly impact the physical, social, and mental health of individuals, their families, and the wider community. Parental substance use can lead to long-term social and health problems for children. Examining resilience and its determinants among families directly affected by may uncover valuable insights to support families addressing SUD. The existing literature does not adequately address substance use within the context of families with young children and community resilience.

aimThe current study aims to enhance our understanding of the daily impact of family members' direct substance use or exposure to indirect substance use within the community on children and families through qualitative interviews.

methodsThe present study was a qualitative secondary analysis. Families with a self-identified history of adversity and resilience were enrolled in the main study. The qualitative transcripts were analyzed following reflexive thematic analysis.

findingsSix families (12 adults, 4 children) were included in the secondary analysis. The analysis generated four themes: (1) How children affect resilience in families affected by SUD; (2) Service needs of parents with SUD to enhance family resilience; (3) The role of social support in family resilience; and (4) How perceptions of safety and trust challenge community resilience.

conclusionsThe study highlights the significant impact of family and community on the resilience of individuals affected by SUD. It emphasizes the importance of developing addictions services and social environments that are supportive of families with young children and supports the need for services that are substance-free, inclusive, and welcoming to children. Additionally, there is a need to improve service navigation and reduce barriers to care commonly experienced by parents affected by SUD.

Indexed as

FamilySubstance-Related DisordersAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParentsQualitative ResearchResilience, PsychologicalSocial Support

Identifiers

PMID40668848
PMCPMC12266456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.