Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40668841›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Physician perspectives on reducing harm and supporting emergency department patients who use drugs.

Zoe K D Collins, Elaine Hyshka, Karine J Lavergne, Savannah M Weber, Ginetta Salvalaggio, Cindy Jiaxin Xue, Arlanna Pugh, Janusz Kaczorowski, Aaron M Orkin, Andrew Kestler and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Zoe K D CollinsSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2483-5308
Elaine HyshkaSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Karine J LavergneInner City Health and Wellness Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Savannah M WeberSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Ginetta SalvalaggioInner City Health and Wellness Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Cindy Jiaxin XueInner City Health and Wellness Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Arlanna PughInner City Health and Wellness Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Janusz KaczorowskiDepartment of Family and Emergency Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Aaron M OrkinDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1111-8720
Andrew KestlerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, St Paul's Hospital and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9358-0272
Kathryn A DongInner City Health and Wellness Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0843-4618

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople who use drugs (PWUD) frequently seek care in the emergency department (ED). Little is known about ED physician perspectives and experiences integrating a harm reduction approach into care, including interventions that reduce the health, social and legal consequences of drug use without requiring a reduction in drug use.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe the experiences of Canadian emergency physicians caring for PWUD, and facilitators and barriers to implementing harm reduction interventions in the ED.

methodsPurposive sampling, using an existing national network, and snowball sampling techniques were used to recruit practicing emergency physicians. Semi-structured, one-on-one telephone interviews were conducted until theoretical data saturation was achieved. Interview recordings were transcribed and analyzed using latent content analysis. Interviews took place between June 2019 and February 2020. This work is a secondary analysis specifically focused on harm reduction approaches to care.

results32 physician interviews were included. Participants had a median of 10 years of experience (range 1-33) and most (29/32) worked in urban EDs. Participants highlighted the complexities of caring for PWUD, including the intersection of structural vulnerability with substance use. The ED environment varied across Canada and either facilitated or hindered the adoption of harm reduction interventions. Additional barriers included a lack of training and experience; lack of community follow-up care; insufficient ED funding and staffing resources; and, tensions over the appropriate scope of emergency medicine practice. Facilitators included tailored education and training; specialized multidisciplinary teams; ED harm reduction champions; and standardized protocols.

conclusionsThough variability existed in the adoption and practice of harm reduction in Canadian EDs, most interviewed physicians supported a harm reduction approach to care. To facilitate widespread ED adoption of harm reduction interventions, there is a need for standardized guidance, supplemental resources, facilitated culture change, and sufficient community-based services.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDrug UsersEmergency Service, HospitalHarm ReductionPhysiciansSubstance-Related DisordersAdultCanadaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID40668841
PMCPMC12266462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.