ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
Diverse and dynamic influences of saccades on visual representations in the mouse superior colliculus.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
How do sensory systems account for stimuli generated by natural behavior? We addressed this question by examining how an ethologically relevant class of saccades modulates visual representations in the mouse superior colliculus (SC), a key region for sensorimotor integration. Leveraging the conserved natural tendency to make saccades that reset the eye-head angle to a default position via the optokinetic reflex, we developed an efficient and unbiased "white noise" approach to study the modulation of representations of visual stimuli by stochastically timed resetting saccades in large neuronal populations in awake, untrained head-fixed mice. Extracellular Neuropixels recordings revealed that saccades significantly impacted population representations of the visual probes in the SC, with early enhancement that began prior to saccade initiation and pronounced suppression for several hundred milliseconds following saccades, independent of units' visual response properties or directional tuning. To determine whether visual or motor signals are responsible for saccadic modulation, we presented fictive saccades-rapid translations of the visual scene-that simulated the visual experience during saccades in the absence of motor output. Some units exhibited similar modulation by fictive and real saccades, suggesting a sensory-driven origin of saccadic modulation, while others had dissimilar modulation, indicating a motor contribution. These findings establish a simple and robust mouse model to study how movements affect sensory representations and advance our understanding of the neural basis of natural visual coding across species and behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.