ArticlePloS one2025
An agent-based model for household COVID-19 transmission in Gauteng, South Africa.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since the discovery of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China in 2019, close to seven million people have died from the infection. At the onset of the pandemic, many countries enacted stringent measures such as school and event closings in a bid to control and curtail the spread of the virus, leading to many within-household infections as people spent more time at home. This study develops an agent-based model (ABM) to gain insight into the impact of government COVID-19 mitigation guidelines and policy options on within-household and community COVID-19 infections in Gauteng, South Africa. Gauteng is the province in South Africa having the smallest land area, but it accounts for 25.8% of the country's population. Agents are randomly assigned to cells on a [Formula: see text] square grid varying according to Gauteng's population density and household size distribution. We found that the percentage of within-household infections is higher in communities with smaller population densities, with the reverse being true for communities with larger population densities. Furthermore, as the agents' movement activation rate increases, community-related infections increase, especially in communities with small population densities. Our study found an interesting phenomenon, observed for the first time: the existence of a movement activation threshold where the percentage and number of outside household infections overtake the percentage and number of within household infections when the activation rate increases. Lastly, our simulation results captured the two epidemic peaks experienced in Gauteng from March 30, 2020 to June 22, 2021 while varying quarantine violation and movement activation rates. Thus, the developed ABM can be used to exploit the implications of COVID-19 mitigation guidelines and policy options on household transmission to provide interesting insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.