SynthesisPloS one2025
Unveiling the link: Evaluating MTHFR gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk through meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer pathogenesis is a multifactorial process, with genetic factors playing a significant role in cancer development. A review of published meta-analyses on MTHFR gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer susceptibility showed inconsistent findings and failed to assess the reliability of statistically significant results. Case-control studies were manually searched in databases to investigate the association between MTHFR gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer. The study assessed the strength of association for the five gene models by calculating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The study results were also analyzed for the source of heterogeneity, sensitivity, publication bias, and false-positive report probability (FPRP) test. Additionally, extensive subgroup analyses were conducted to investigate the impact of confounding factors on the associations. The study suggests that MTHFR C677T gene polymorphism reduces the risk of colorectal cancer in Asian and mixed-race populations, while increasing the risk of Colorectal cancer in the Indian ethnic group. MTHFR A1298C may play a protective role in the development of colorectal cancer. These findings provide valuable insights for the early diagnosis and prevention of Colorectal cancer. However, further studies are required to confirm the association, which may offer additional information for the early diagnosis and prevention of Colorectal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.