ArticlePloS one2025
Development of a risk prediction model for sepsis-related delirium based on multiple machine learning approaches and an online calculator.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and external validation of a 90-day mortality prediction model for comatose sepsis patients: impact of cerebrovascular disease and dementia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- A machine learning-based prediction model for delirium risk in malnourished elderly ICU patients with SHAP interpretability.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting Deep Vein Thrombosis in Critically Ill Patients with COPD: Development and Multicenter External Validation.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Models for Predicting Antipsychotic Effectiveness and Separate Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in Hospitalized Schizophrenia Patients.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting cognitive impairment in patients with sepsis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSepsis-associated delirium (SAD) occurs due to disruptions in neurotransmission linked to inflammatory responses from infections. It poses significant challenges in clinical management and is associated with poor outcomes. Survivors often experience long-term cognitive and behavioral issues that impact their quality of life and place a burden on their families. This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of SAD in critically ill patients. Additionally, we constructed an online risk calculator to facilitate real-time clinical assessment.
methodsThis study is a retrospective analysis utilizing data from 16,120 patients in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. To manage imbalanced data, we applied the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) method. Feature selection was conducted using Multivariate Logistic Regression, LASSO regression, and the Boruta algorithm. We developed predictive models using eight machine learning algorithms and selected the best one for validation. The SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used for visualization and interpretation, enhancing the clinical understanding of the model, alongside the creation of an online web calculator.
resultsWe combined three feature selection methods to identify 17 key features for our machine learning prediction model. The Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model demonstrated excellent calibration and strong predictive accuracy in the validation cohort. The SHAP feature importance ranking revealed five critical risk factors for predicting outcomes: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), ICU stay duration, chloride, sodium, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). Based on this optimal model, we successfully developed an online web calculator.
conclusionWe developed and validated a machine learning model capable of accurately predicting SAD with high clinical applicability. The integration of interpretable machine learning and an online calculator offers a practical tool to support early identification and timely management of SAD in critically ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.