SynthesisPloS one2025
Do metacognitions contribute to pathological health anxiety? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metacognitive beliefs about biased thinking condition the role of anxiety sensitivity in the somatic symptom-health anxiety pathway.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe purpose of this meta-analysis is to give an overview of the relationships between positive and negative metacognitions (PMC, NMC) with health anxiety and pathological safety seeking and avoidant behavior (SSB, AB).
methodThe preregistered systematic literature screening included following data bases: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, and The German National Library. The studies were evaluated based on predefined eligibility criteria (i.e., data for PMC/NMC and health anxiety and/ or SSB/AB from adult samples, assessed with validated inventories and presented in English or German language) and risk of bias categories. Correlation coefficients were aggregated with random effect models. Publication biases were estimated with contour enhanced funnel plots and outlier analyses.
results23 studies (N = 9229) were included in the meta-analysis. Most studies assessed health anxiety in analogue samples. A significant medium effect was found for PMC and health anxiety (r = .36, p < 0.0001, 95% CI:.29 ≤ r ≤ .43), whereas for NMC the effect was large (r = .52, p < 0.0001, 95% CI:.46 ≤ r ≤ .58). For the relationship with SSB the results revealed a moderate effect for PMC (r = 0.31, p = .004; 95%-CI: 0.19 ≤ r ≤ 0.42) and a small effect for NMC (r = .25, p = .02, 95% CI:.05 ≤ r ≤ .43). No study assessed AB. DISCUSSION: Metacognitions are a significant pathological factor in health anxiety, with particularly strong association with NMC. PMC might be of special interest for health anxiety and SSB compared to other psychopathologies. Heterogeneity, missing clinical samples and studies on AB limit generalizability. Future research should further explore the role of metacognitions in health anxiety and focus on the relation with pathological SSB and AB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.