Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40668781›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2025

Risk factors and incidence of surgical wound infection after stoma reversal: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Siruo Li, Ziyi Zhou, Feixia Wang, Weizhen Li, Chaoxu Liu, Lu Li

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Siruo LiZhejiang University, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Ziyi ZhouZhejiang University, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Feixia WangDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2416-4971
Weizhen LiDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Chaoxu LiuDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.
Lu LiDepartment of Nursing, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou City, Zhejiang Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the incidence and risk factors of incisional infection following stoma reversal surgery. As of July 30, 2024, an extensive literature search was conducted on databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase, and OpenGrey. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach. Data analysis was performed using Stata 14.0.20 articles were included, with a total sample size of 8542, including 723 patients with incision infection. The incidence of incision infection was 12%(95%CI:0.094-0.145). The results identified 5 patient-related risk factors of incisional infection, including stoma type (OR: 3.06, P = 0.015), inflammatory bowel disease (OR: 1.91, P = 0.012), Body Mass Index (BMI; OR: 1.12, P < 0.01), period from stoma creation (OR: 0.18, P = 0.012), and surgical site infection (SSI) after primary surgery (OR: 3.57, P < 0.01), and 3 surgery-related risk factors, including subcutaneous drainage (OR: 0.26, P = 0.019), suture method (OR: 4.83, P < 0.01), operation time > 60 min (OR: 4.33, P < 0.01), operation time (continuous variable, OR: 1.004, P < 0.01). Clinical staff can refer to the influential factors in this study to reduce the incidence of incision infection.

Indexed as

Surgical StomasSurgical Wound InfectionHumansIncidenceRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID40668781
PMCPMC12266411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.