Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40668780›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Generating opposition to universal health care policies in the United States: An analysis of private health industry advertising on Meta platforms.

Kendra Chow, Marco Zenone, Nora Kenworthy, Beza Merid, Nason Maani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kendra ChowFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7597-8672
Marco ZenoneSchool of Public Policy and Global Affairs, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Nora KenworthySchool of Nursing & Health Studies, University of Washington Bothell, Bothell, Washington, United States of America.
Beza MeridSchool for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0095-3181
Nason MaaniGlobal Health Policy Unit, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3398-0688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2019, the Partnership for America's Health Care Future (PAHCF), a private health industry lobby group, launched a campaign across Meta platforms (Facebook, Instagram) to generate opposition to universal health care policies in the United States. This study investigates the content and themes prevalent in PAHCF's campaign and how these might shape public discourse and perceptions around universal health care policies. Using qualitative content analysis, 1675 advertisements were examined on Meta platforms within PAHCF's campaign. Inductive methodology was applied to develop a coding framework. Details of campaign spend and number of impressions advertisements received were also collected. The qualitative coding strategies identified three overarching campaign foci: policy targets, claims and themes, and targeted appeal groups. These elements were found to strategically and mutually reinforce one another to generate the narrative that proposed universal health care policies will be detrimental to public health, the economy, and society. Analysis identified that PAHCF engages in strategies common among unhealthy commodity industries. Social media in this instance powerfully perpetuated PAHCF messages that undermined universal health care efforts and contributed to the commercial determinants of health impacts of this industry. These findings indicate that the private health care industry is participating in wider commercial determinants of health activities, acting to protect their profits to the detriment of public health. Like other campaigns by unhealthy commodity industries, PAHCF's campaign is designed to increase doubt in the benefits of health policies, undermine public trust in government and evidence, and promote public alignment with their own messaging and preferred solutions. To counter such tactics, public health professionals need to gain a better understanding of the strategies unhealthy commodity industries utilize to deflect attention from their underlying health-harming intentions, especially through more novel platforms like social media.

Identifiers

PMID40668780
PMCPMC12266455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.