ArticlePloS one2025
Maternity care professionals' preparedness for and experiences of screening and responding to disclosures of domestic violence in the peripartum period: A protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternity care professionals, such as midwives, public health nurses, doctors, and social workers, are in the unique position of having regular contact with women in the peripartum period. They are well-placed to recognise and respond to disclosures of domestic violence, however many lack confidence and feel unprepared for this in practice. While there are screening tools used for enquiry about domestic violence in pregnancy, there are variations in the tools used, the frequency and timing of enquiry, and the response/referral pathways across professions. Research exists on the role of health care professionals such as midwives, doctors, and nurses with regards to domestic violence, however little is understood about the collective and shared experience of maternity care professionals who screen for and respond to domestic violence in the peripartum period.
methodsA qualitative evidence synthesis of maternity care professionals' preparedness for and experiences of screening and responding to disclosures of domestic violence in the peripartum period will be conducted. Qualitative studies of any design, and mixed method and other design studies where qualitative data can be extracted will be considered for inclusion. A systematic search of the following electronic bibliographic databases will be conducted: ASSIA, CINAHL, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO and SocINDEX. The Critical Skills Appraisal Programme (CASP) qualitative studies tool will be used to assess methodological quality of included studies. Data synthesis will involve three sequential stages, coding, development of descriptive themes and generation of analytical themes. Confidence in findings will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual) tool. DISCUSSION: This QES will provide a deeper understanding of maternity care professionals' preparedness for and experiences of screening and responding to domestic violence disclosures in the peripartum period. The findings will, potentially, identify what aspects of education and preparedness work well and what might be improved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.