Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40668775›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Secrecy strategies: Global patterns in elites' quest for confidentiality in offshore finance.

Ho-Chun Herbert Chang, Brooke Harrington, Daniel Rockmore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ho-Chun Herbert ChangProgram in Quantitative Social Science, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0056-2527
Brooke HarringtonDepartment of Sociology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.
Daniel RockmoreDepartment of Mathematics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scholars and policy-makers know a lot about the ways offshore financial centers compete with one another to offer secrecy to elites, but still know too little about how and why elites take up these offerings to conceal their assets and identities offshore. This paper fills the gap in knowledge by examining the distinct patterns for achieving offshore secrecy among elites in 65 countries. We take a cross-national comparative perspective, showing that the patterns are contingent in part on political conditions in the elites' home countries. Using data from two publicly available sources- the Offshore Leaks Database and the World Justice Project Rule of Law Index-we advance knowledge for scholars and policy-makers with three main results. First, we find that elites from corrupt countries are more likely to spread their assets across multiple offshore financial centers: they diversify across the system, instead of putting all their eggs in one basket. Second, countries where the risk of government confiscation of private assets is high-either due to lack of civil rights or very effective law enforcement-elites make heavy use of identity-concealing offshore strategies such as bearer instruments and nominees to shield their names from discovery in public records. Third, elites from countries where both corruption and confiscation pose significant risks make extensive use of blacklisted offshore financial centers, despite the reputational and practical risks that entails for them. All three patterns achieve secrecy, but through different means; our findings have implications for public policy, as well as for models of inequality, elites, and financial crime.

Indexed as

ConfidentialityFinancial ManagementHumansInternationality

Identifiers

PMID40668775
PMCPMC12266413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.